Personal replies cannot be handled due to the volume of mail.Ready to start a blog? Become the frontrunner of a locally-brought news source or just share your insights on new technology.
#Amberlight ux plus#
Got a question? Send it to Eric Lai at Include year, make, model and kilometers of auto cited, plus your name, address and telephone number. Nonetheless, for a few months afterward, I was slamming on my brakes at amber lights - and often came close to being rear-ended - rather than risk having to go through that arduous courtroom ordeal again.
#Amberlight ux drivers#
And turning drivers always have the legal onus to ensure that it’s done in safety. Drivers are required to stop on an amber light if possible, but proceeding through is lawful under certain circumstances. For a legal opinion, consult with a lawyer or licensed paralegal qualified in this area of law.Īlso note that I’m not, in any way, advocating that motorists run amber or red lights or drive in a dangerous manner. Please note that the above represents the outcome of a particular ticket case only and any arguments/interpretations expressed should not be taken as legal opinion or advice. The officer hastily exited the court room, whereas a sergeant observing the proceedings gave a congratulatory wink and a smile.
The justice accepted her testimony and dismissed the case. 144(1) HTA, “intersection” includes the crosswalk area. In fact, staying put would be an “improper stop – stop wrong place” violation under S. In this instance, she is deemed to have already lawfully entered the intersection on green and is required by law to clear it, when safe to do so, on a subsequent amber or red light. (The justice never did rule on this point.)Īs for the defendant, she testified that her vehicle was actually past the stop line and in the marked crosswalk area at the time the light changed to amber. “Amber light – fail to stop” cannot apply because she had indeed stopped. The logical inference here is that if the law intended “amber light – proceed before green” to be illegal, it would have specified it exactly as it did in S.
#Amberlight ux driver#
The latter violation occurs if a driver comes to a halt but then goes through anyhow on red. Two types of charges are listed: “red light – fail to stop” and “red light – proceed before green” (in community safety zone, if applicable). If you contrast this subsection with subsection 144(18) HTA, you’ll notice that it says drivers facing a red traffic light must stop and shall not proceed until a green indication is shown. It’s only when she moved ahead that the supposed violation occurs. If so, this fully satisfies the requirements of this section. The sole offence listed for this section is “amber light – fail to stop” (in community safety zone, if applicable).Īccording to the officer, she was stopped behind the marked stop line when the light turned amber. Subsection 144(15) HTA states that drivers facing an amber traffic light shall stop if it can be done safely, otherwise they may proceed with caution.
In other words, she made a safe, uneventful left turn. When the traffic light turned from green to amber and the large truck ahead of her cleared, she completed her turn, in safety, on the amber light. This offence carries a $180 fine and three demerit points.īasically, she was stopped behind other vehicles in the marked left-turn lane at an intersection. Q: Is a perfectly safe left turn on an amber light illegal?Ī: Recently, I attended Richmond Hill traffic court representing a relative charged with “amber light – fail to stop” under S. Eric Lai answers your automotive questions every week for Wheels.
0 kommentar(er)
